Netflix: The New Cinema?

For decades, the word “cinema” has been synonymous with the immersive experience of sitting in a darkened theater, surrounded by the hum of anticipation and the aroma of buttered popcorn. The magic of the silver screen has held a special place in our hearts, creating memories that linger long after the credits roll.

However, with the advent of streaming platforms like Netflix, the landscape of film consumption is undergoing a seismic shift. We all tend to use new digital tools to explore whatever interests us – be it new series and movies like all of us cinephiles do, or cheats and tricks for video games and bonus codes for sports betting like bet365 Boonuskood – so it’s not so easy to resist the easy access Netflix offers us. Let’s dive into the debate surrounding whether Netflix became the new cinema and explore the implications of this digital revolution on the traditional film industry.

The Rise of Streaming Platforms

In recent years, streaming platforms have disrupted the traditional model of film distribution, with Netflix emerging as a frontrunner in this cinematic revolution. The convenience of streaming from the comfort of our homes, the accessibility of an extensive library of films and series, and the elimination of time constraints have contributed to the growing popularity of platforms like Netflix.

Advantages of Netflix as a Cinematic Platform

One cannot ignore the advantages that Netflix brings to the table. The convenience of on-demand streaming allows viewers to tailor their film-watching experience to their schedules. The vast library of content spans genres, providing a diverse range of stories that may not have found a place in the limited offerings of traditional cinema. Moreover, Netflix’s support for independent filmmakers has democratized film distribution, offering a platform for unique voices that might otherwise struggle to find an audience.

The Drawbacks of the Streaming Model

However, the rise of streaming platforms has not been without its challenges. The decline of the theatrical experience raises concerns about the impact on box office revenues and the survival of smaller theaters and independent cinemas. As audiences increasingly turn to the convenience of streaming, the communal joy of watching a film together in a theater risks fading into nostalgia. This shift also poses challenges for filmmakers who dream of seeing their creations on the big screen.

Changing Viewing Habits and Binge-Watching Culture

The advent of streaming platforms has not only changed where we watch films but also how we watch them. The rise of binge-watching culture has altered the traditional episodic format, transforming how stories are told and consumed. The ability to binge-watch an entire series in one sitting has become a cultural phenomenon, influencing the way we engage with narratives and characters.

Quality Content and Critical Acclaim

Netflix has also transformed the landscape of content creation. The platform’s investment in original films and series has led to critically acclaimed productions, with some even securing prestigious awards. The quality of storytelling and the caliber of talent involved in Netflix productions have blurred the lines between traditional and streaming content.

Film Festivals and the Streaming Giant

Film festivals, once exclusive domains for traditional cinema, now find streaming giants like Netflix as major players. These platforms have become essential in acquiring and distributing festival favorites, giving global exposure to films that may have otherwise stayed within the confines of these events.

Industry Response and Awards Eligibility

The film industry, ever-adapting, is responding to the rise of streaming platforms. However, this evolution is not without controversy, especially in the realm of awards eligibility. The debate surrounding whether films primarily released on streaming platforms should be eligible for prestigious awards like the Oscars reflects the industry’s grappling with the changing nature of film distribution.

A Balanced Perspective

In conclusion, the question of whether Netflix is the new cinema is complex and multifaceted. While streaming platforms have undoubtedly revolutionized how we consume media, traditional theaters still hold a unique place in the hearts of cinephiles. Besides, let’s not ignore the fact that Netflix does not offer every single movie ever made, especially if you’re outside of the US, so the platform definitely has its limits. The coexistence of both models allows for a diverse cinematic landscape, where viewers can choose between the communal experience of theaters and the convenience of streaming. As the film industry continues to evolve, one thing remains clear – the magic of cinema, whether experienced in a theater or on a streaming platform, is here to stay.


Strange Movie Genres You Have Never Heard About

You would think that classic movie genres have nothing more to offer. Throughout the history of cinema, we had the opportunity to watch so many action movies, dramas and comedies that we don’t know is there anything else that can surprise us. However, movie genres have never been restricted categories. Over the years, they changed, grouped, and mixed elements with one another. 

The Weirdest Movie Genres Ever

Cinematography hides many less known movie genres. With absolute artistic freedom to create, unconventional filmmakers are producing movies that belong to weird and strange genres that only true fans can recognize.

Bollywood Horror

Bollywood films are specific because they contain a lot of traditional Hindi elements, such as dance. That is why embracing horror as a popular genre in India was unthinkable for some critics. However, this genre developed in the ‘40s. The first Hindi horror movie was Mahal, an exotic display of terrors of everyday life.


This genre was born in the eighties, in post-revolutionary Russia. It is an experimental artistic movement with Yevgeny Yufit as the leading moviemaker. The genre deals with the subject of death and human remains, with elements of dark humor and absurdity (Suicide Warthogs from 1988 or Spring from 1987).


Bizarro is more of an artistic performance than a movie. It does not follow a particular action — it is absurd and surreal. The example is Holy Mountain, a 1973 film that pushed the boundaries and simply laid the foundations for the bizarre.


This genre in moviemaking may be closer to you under the term psycho-thriller or as a sub-genre of horror with a theme of the mentally ill people. The best representation of this genre is the 1962 movie Whatever Happened to Baby Jane


It is a movie genre born in Eastern Europe during some quite strange years for this part of the world. It was similar to the American Westerns; the only good guys are Soviet heroes fighting for the Soviet Union.

Ostern in Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia, on the other hand, had a more humorous approach to the subject. The 1964 Lemonade Joe movie is a funny story about the hero who is fighting against alcohol.

Parkour Movies

This recent trend in moviemaking is a result of popular video games. Movies like Prince of Persia represent the Parkour genre. In the majority of the scenes, the main protagonist demonstrates the skill of jumping and overcoming obstacles, which is precisely the essential difference from the classic fight scenes.

It would be unfair to choose the genre you love the most. You will miss out on many weird but original movies that can genuinely delight you. So be open when choosing the next one to watch.


Are Casino-Related Movies Filmed in Actual Casinos?

With modern technology and great Hollywood productions, it’s possible to make a movie without leaving the studio. Stunning landscapes, famous sights, dragons or battles, all can be done in front of the green screen. But when it comes to casino-related movies, most of them were actually set in real casinos. Of course, these movies don’t show the online side of betting in casinos with the Mr Green VR bonus, for example, but they focus on the real thing – what it’s like to actually be there and face the pressure of winning or losing.

It’s All About Authenticity

Many moviemakers have opted to shot in a real gambling environment. Regarding the heavy equipment and demanding settings, it is much easier to stay in the studio; however, placing the whole movie cast into the five-star casino hotel in Los Vegas is a big opportunity to create a remarkable piece of art. 

First, hotels like this have the best possible set designs. You can create fantastic scenery in a studio; however, you can never fully evoke the authentic jackpot jingling or the euphoria at the roulette tables. It’s all about small details and vibes that casinos have.

Also, actors can spend some time in a realistic ambiance and pick up a few tricks from the tables. This way, they can explore their roles and experience their characters better.

Best Movies Shot in Real Casinos

Ocean’s 11 (2001) — This movie gathered the elite acting craw in one of the most famous casinos in Los Vegas — Bellagio. The exciting story follows a group of charming criminals that are planning a heist and, during a lot of scenes, you can notice the beauty and luxury of this hotel.

What Happens in Vegas (2008) — It is a delightful comedy about two strangers who got married in Los Vegas. Cameron Diaz and Ashton Kutcher play the leading roles, and most of the casino scenes were shot at the Park MGM resort. 

The Hangover (2009) — A hilarious comedy follows a bachelor party in Vegas that went wrong. Most of the scenes were filmed at the famous casino-hotel in Sin City, the remarkable Cesar Palas.

Casino (1995) — The movie is one of the greatest Martin Scorsese’s masterpieces with Robert De Niro, Sharon Stone and Joe Pesci in leading roles. 

It was shot at Rivera Casino, twenty years before its demolition due to the construction of Convention Center. 

This movie hired real croupiers and dealers from Rivera. Also, Scorsese didn’t kick out a group of regular casino visitors who were too loud. On the contrary, he demanded them to stay so that movie scenes could be more authentic.

Casino Royale (2006) — One of the movies from the franchise about secret agent James Bond starring Daniel Craig.

Unlike most casino-related movies, this one was not shot in Las Vegas. The story takes place in Montenegro, but casino scenes were filmed partly in the Czech Republic and partly in the Bahamas. Royal Casino actually took the appearance of Atlantis Casino on Paradise Island.

21 (2008) — The movie follows a group of MIT students that play Blackjack in Las Vegas. Main scenes were taken in Planet Hollywood Casino, a relatively new but huge hotel and gambling resort. 


7 Things You Should Never Say To Cinephile

Most of us enjoy playing games, using a betano offer, or watching a movie or two in our free time. Some people, however, are die-hard movie fans – otherwise known as cinephiles and they watch movies not only for fun – they watch it with a passion that we (not all of us!) don’t possess.

When you find yourself in a group of passionate cinema lovers, be careful about what you will say. They are a special type of people who will, for a single wrong statement about movies, rebuke and cut you off from their company.

What makes a real cinephile particularly offended, besides the fact that someone does not like to watch movies at all, are the unqualified people who are trying to make conversations about a movie. Always have in mind that they are the most competent for such debates. Also, remember these seven things you should never say to the person whose real passion is cinematography:

  • It’s a Waste of Time

We hope you have never tried to say such a thing to the cinephile. If you did, we hope you had a big smile on your face and told it as a joke.

True cinema lovers will never say, not even for the worst movie, that it’s a waste of time. They find cinematography to be the source of inspiration, wisdom, and knowledge; therefore, it’s worth each second.

  • Why Would I Watch a Movie I’ve Watched Before?

Obviously, you have never delved deep enough into movies if you find it annoying to watch the same one multiple times. Watching a favorite movie is always a new experience, depending on the period you watch it, your life course or your mood. 

  • Cinematography Is Not a Form of Art

Statements like this can evoke a tornado of comments. A cinephile will lecture you about post-revolutionary Russian art film, surrealism, Igmar Bergam, and provide you with a million other pieces of evidence that will prove cinematography has always been an integral part of the art. Moreover, the cinematography was a pioneer of many artistic movements throughout history.

  • Black and White Movies Are so Boring

Cinephile would tell you that you don’t deserve to watch them, as black and white films are elite. Citizen Cane, Psycho or To Kill a Mockingbird, are just some of the relics that you should never underestimate.

  • A Book Is Better Than a Screen Adaptation

Movie lovers will say that this kind of statement is ridiculous. Books are entirely different dimensions, as literature is a completely different art form. A movie can carry out the story and characters in its particular way, and the experience of watching it is unique. 

  • I’ll Watch It Later When It Comes out on DVD

True fans know that in two years, when the sequel to the movie they just watched comes out, they will be in the same movie theatre and watch it. If you show less interest in a new movie, they will find offensive.

  • Who Cares About the Awards?

Awards do matter. It is not just about fancy nights and glamorous toilets. The Academy Award, Golden Palm or the Bear from Belin are the recognition of meaningful work of art and human brilliance. They are also proof that cinephiles were right about everything mentioned above. 


Blade Runner, Caught Up With the Real World

Los Angeles, November 2019. Extremely polluted air, artificial lights, flying cars. No, this is not a dream; this is how Ridley Scott imagined the world 37 years ago in his sci-fi classic, the Blade Runner. 

He found the inspiration in Philip K. Dick’s novel Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sleep and created a movie about the police officer on his mission to hunt down a fugitive group of replicants, or human clones. The story is located partly in outer space and partly in Los Angeles, which makes this movie both futuristic and apocalyptical. 

The Blade Runner Is Happening Now

Everyone who grew up with Blade Runner had an ingrained idea of the future based on this movie. Finally, it is caught in real-time, and we are its witnesses. Moreover, we can be pretty cruel judges about whether Scott was a visionary who predicted the future or his fiction was entirely untrue.

Expectations Too High

Well, we don’t have replicants. At least not yet. So Ridley might have hurried with humanlike clones and artificial intelligence.

But we do have humanoid robots, and that can be considered the beginning. For example, Sophia is a replicant prototype with a human appearance. Luckily, far away from the Blade Runner prediction, our robots are not even close to starting the rebellion.

The next red “x” goes to flying cars. Everyone dreams about such a revolutionary vehicle, but we are still stuck in traffic, down on the ground. 

Also, unlike in the movie, we haven’t yet established a single colony in space. In real 2019, life officially exists only on planet Earth.

What Did the Blade Runner Overlook?

In the movie, there’s no Internet. In a futuristic 2019, people are still reading newspapers. There are no cellphones, either. The creators recognized some things, like voice control or lie detector, as a useful technology, but it is almost comic to see cathode-ray monitors and TV sets as a part of the future/present. 

The movie failed to predict some of the most significant 21st-century discoveries, but perhaps that is the point that makes it even more attractive to watch in 2019. Imagine that you have to fight humanlike androids and robots without the Internet or cellphone. It seems really scary.

What Was Ridley Scott Right About?

First of all, the Blade Runner story brings some compelling ethical dilemmas and a hero who is questioning his own humanity. It focuses on the future of the human race — everything we cause and everything we can prevent.

In Ridley’s year of 2019, the world is polluted in so many different aspects. In the present 2019, things are not much better. Our air has never been worse. The neon lights surround us. We are drowning in a capitalist dystopia, political and ethical bumpiness, dominated by global corporations. We tolerate criminals. Perhaps the movie had a real vision about the future.

Thankfully, we find the beauty in this sci-fi masterpiece, and we find it in our real lives. The Earth is still a home of gorgeous, stylish women, good cops, and fancy drinks. And yes, we are so lucky to have a magnificent Harrison Ford around. Unfortunately, our beloved Rutger Hauer left us at the beginning of the year. Let’s just say he didn’t want to get trapped in real-time, so he became a legend.


Ten Fan Theories About Popular Movies

While many of us like to spend our free time by looking for games or various Online casino offers, some people prefer spending their free time by watching movies. Each movie that captures the interest of the audience must provide enough excitement and energy, as well as have a great script. Yet, great directors will never reveal everything — for the most exciting details, they will give only a hint.

Hidden Messages & Conspiracy Theories

On the other hand, true fans can have a vast imagination. They can make stories even more twisted and complicated than the movie itself. So they create myths, conspiracies, and theories that keep one move eternal.

We heard that Walt Disney was a spy and Willy Wanka a serial killer. There is a Matrix inside the Matrix, and some movie heroes actually don’t exist. From all the facts and theories that movie lovers bring up every day, we will single out some of the most original ones.

John Wick is Actually Neo

Keanu Reeves’ fans might see the connection between his most celebrated character, Neo, and the latest hit about the avenger and fighter John Wick. Many believe that John Wick is actually Neo on his Matrix training program. So, is John Wick a sequel to the famous Matrix?

Miranda, Samantha, and Charlotte Do Not Exist

Years after the HBO series Sex and the city is over, the story about the girls from New York got a whole new theory. Some fans came up with a story that Miranda, Samantha and Charlotte were personalized but represented only a part of Carrie Bradshaw’s character.

Kevin’s Uncle Frank Planned the Hole Robbery

Famous villains in Home Alone were Hary and Marv, but the theory tells that uncle Frank actually was the bad guy who arranged the robbery. 

Shining Inspired Disney’s Frozen

In parallel Universum, princess Elsa is Jack Torrence, and her sister Anna is little Danny from the horror classic The Shining. Except for too much snow, do you see any other similarity?

Jack From Titanic Is a Terminator

Some fans believe that Jack is a time-traveler who came from the future to save Rose and make sure she survives. He is related to another time-traveling savior or destroyer — the Terminator.

Harry Potter Is Mentally Ill, Abused Boy

Stories like Harry Potter serve to expand our imagination and make sense of a variety of possible theories, but one of them is particularly disturbing. Imagine that the whole world of Harry Poter did not exist and that he was mentally disturbed after being closed in a dusty, dark staircase, so he imagined everything. Quite a sad story, isn’t it?

Sandy Dies At The Begining Of the Movie Grease

Some cruel fans’ theories indicate that Grease is actually a movie about dead lovers. Sandy died at the beginning, and Danny is singing about it in “Summer Nights.” The final scene in a car that takes off represents her going to Heaven.

The Avengers Overturn — Tony Stark Is a Member of Hydra

Remember Ultron or support for Sokovia Accords? The theory goes that, if you think logically, Tony Star always sabotaged the Avengers, wanting their mission to fail. The only person who realized it was Doctor Strange.

Jamie Lannister Was Mind-Controlled by Bran Stark

GoT characters, Jamie Lannister and Bran Stark, had a really complicated relationship since season one. However, during the first season, things weren’t so bright — Bran controlled Jamie using his mind power in order to throw him off the tower. Jamie remained a cripple but gained powers that eventually led him to the throne.

Nemo Doesn’t Exist

Theorists identify five stages of mourning in this animated movie. A clownfish lost everyone at the beginning, and Nemo is his fiction. The little hero has never existed.